2. What’s wrong with the flag we’ve got?

Nothing really, if you look at the style and the colours on its own – it’s actually quite a nice flag, (though others disagree, citing aesthetics, design etc). Nor do I see anything wrong with the Union Jack itself – it’s a great flag for Britain. So as well as those for whom the flag has real meaning, I can understand people simply liking the flag and not wanting it to change, or those who wouldn’t mind if it was changed just a little.

The problem is, if we change the current design only a little, it will still feel like a British flag, rather than a New Zealand one. That might not matter to some – especially those from Britain, but consider what this means to Maori, generations of Pakeha who know themselves only as New Zealanders, or all the other races and mixes of people that make up New Zealand. There are people in each of those groups who genuinely like and respect the flag, but there are also many others who don’t, and our flag should be something we're all proud of.

For example, some people want the Maori flag as our national flag. Although it belongs in New Zealand, it wouldn't feel like my flag, because it shows pride in being Maori. Considering most of our flag is not derived from here, and shows pride in "being British", that doesn't feel right either. The reality is that only some of us can have pride in the Union Jack (and it's unlikely those numbers will increase). It seems wrong to show another country as the most prominent thing, when our flag should allow every one of us to feel pride in this country. A national flag we can all identify with has the power to unite us. There is evidence the current flag can also divide us, and it is short-sighted to dismiss the whole flag-change debate as "not a priority".

Put simply, our flag is more about Britain than about us. We do have a British heritage, but the New Zealand Coat of Arms (a very good reminder of our history) shows a partnership made under the Crown, between the European settlers on one side, and Maori on the other. From that union could have come our own unique flag that would represent all New Zealanders, without the favour or exclusion of the flag that we have.

Alternatively, the flag of the United Tribes (in recognised use when the Treaty was signed), could rightly have been retained as the official New Zealand flag. Instead, the Union Jack was made the official flag. (Note that Maori had lived here for several centuries, before the British arrived). Far from being a minority (and somehow less important, as some still think), the Maori population outnumbered the new settlers by a huge majority at that time. (Just imagine any country doing the same thing to us today and you'll begin to understand). Despite it being clear Maori were not happy with this affront, and Hone Heke showing his anger by chopping the British flag down several times, it was the British way that prevailed. A Maori flag now would never work, but the least we could do is have a new flag that encompasses us all.

The Aussies and us

The Union Jack remained our national flag from 1840 until 1902, when it was replaced by the flag we have now. Officially, our flag is known as the New Zealand Ensign, and is described as "the British Blue Ensign of the Royal Naval Reserve, with the addition of the Southern Cross". So the red stars are definitely ours, but the rest of our flag is entirely a British design. We think of it as being similar to Australia’s flag, but in fact there are a large number of flags that have the same blue background with the Union Jack in the top corner, plus the ones that have the Union Jack with a red or other colour background.

This is most obvious when some of these remaining "colonial" flags are seen together, and presumably each country was given the basic design, upon which they could add their own personal touch – in our case, the Southern Cross stars. Contrary to belief, the blue was not designed to represent our sea or sky, but is simply part of the British flag design we were given. When New Zealand became an independent Dominion, it was us who chose to keep this design as our official flag, whereas almost all of the other Commonwealth countries have changed from the original British-prescribed flag. [Make sure you click on the links above]. You can see some designs the Australians have considered for a new flag at ausflag.com.au.

Some people say that "other countries don't change their flag", but a look at the history of national flags throughout the world shows that this is incorrect. Some flag changes have been minor, some more radical, but there are many countries with flags much newer than our own. Even the most-established flags from older nations were not immune from change in their earlier years. New Zealand is a relatively young country, and we have yet to design our own national flag. When we do, then that flag should live on for many generations to come. In the meantime, we present ourselves to the world with a flag designed not by us, but mostly by Britain on our behalf. That is surely at odds with our more-than-capable image.

But what about Britain?

Changing the flag doesn’t make us a republic, and the connection with Britain is not suddenly forgotten. If we continue to remember our British heritage as suggested (on Page 1), then our two countries will still be like a distant part of the family. It’s just that the younger nation has long since grown up and left home, and many of us are ready to take the next step.

For some of us, it’ll be good to feel more kindly towards Britain, once their presence on our flag is no longer cause for resentment. (Chances are, there are a few Brits who wish they could have their flag all to themselves as well). We are a separate country with our own separate identity – proud to be New Zealanders, and our flag should reflect that. Wanting our own independent flag is just like the normal progression of growing up, and is no more an insult to Britain than daughters who marry and change their name. Seen in that light, Britain might even be pleased that we’ve finally decided to have our own flag.

In regard to a republic

It has been stated that more New Zealanders (especially among young people) are wanting this country to become a republic. Many years ago, I was in favour of this as well. In reality, I knew very little about the wider issues involved – I just thought we should be allowed to run our own country, without having to report to Britain! (My youthful impression was mostly due to our flag). Eventually, I came to realise that we already have autonomy in New Zealand, and that Britain and the Royal Family have little to do with our daily lives, but are there for us to call upon if we choose. It's hard to see how a republic could provide anything better for us.

Over the years, I have noticed a number of good reasons to keep the Monarchy, including all the positive influences on worthy causes, and on general peace and goodwill in the world. (That will continue, regardless of who is the reigning Monarch). More recently, I have looked at the pros and cons of the monarchy versus republic debate, and the idea of a republic no longer appeals to me. However, I do think our flag is an ever-present reminder of Britain, which makes us feel we are not fully independent. A flag with no Union Jack would free us from that perception, and would remove the most-obvious reason for wanting to be a republic.

While a republic would certainly lead to a change of flag, it is wrong to assume a change of flag would lead to a republic. For example, Canada changed their flag in 1965, but they are still part of the Commonwealth and have not become a republic. It is not the Monarchy that is the most visible sign of British involvement in New Zealand – it is the Union Jack. If we change the flag alone, that would already provide an enormous sense of freedom from Britain, and we might then accept the Monarchy as a benign safeguard, that is in our best interests to retain. We don't need to cut ourselves off – but we do need a change in perception.

Becoming a republic has more consequences than some of us realise, and changing our flag would be a very minor thing, in comparison. [A good website to read is monarchy.org.nz]. As a monarchy, we have a Prime Minister, a Governor General, plus the Queen, with specific roles that complement each other, and provide a relaxed stability. As an independent republic, we would have to accept just one person here as our absolute Head of State. We could feel like we have less freedom and independence, rather than more. In any case, it would not be an easy adjustment for us to make.

If we think about it, having a separate person as our official Head of State (someone we can trust, and who trusts us to run our country as we please), is not such a bad thing. The Monarchy might have its failings and anachronisms, but it achieves far more good than harm in this world, and it seems neither right, nor sensible to disown it.

Preserving our New Zealand heritage

As well as considering our British heritage, we should also be considering our own. New Zealand has made huge changes in a relatively short time – from a land that belonged solely to Maori for hundreds of years before Europeans arrived, to the very multi-cultural society we have today. It’s quite possible that in a hundred years from now, it could be a totally different country altogether.

A flag that is about this country would capture our Kiwi spirit, and be something for us all to aspire to, regardless of where we are from. Other cultures if we let them can enrich our lives with their diversity, but at the same time, the distinctive New Zealand character that has come largely from the Maori/Pakeha combination is something most of us would not want to lose. The way to do this is not by seeing or putting up cultural barriers, but by helping other cultures to fit in. Ideally, we would respect or appreciate harmless differences, and see that we are all one people under the flag. Unfortunately, our current flag doesn’t give us that message.

Index Previous Next